<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Call Option Trading Secrets &#187; How To Trade Options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calloptiontrading.net/tag/how-to-trade-options/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calloptiontrading.net</link>
	<description>Making money with call options</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:37:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stock Option Trading â Fundamental Flaw in Fundamental Analysis and Stock Picking</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-fundamental-flaw-in-fundamental-analysis-and-stock-picking</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-fundamental-flaw-in-fundamental-analysis-and-stock-picking#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relative Strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-fundamental-flaw-in-fundamental-analysis-and-stock-picking</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinging on to Fundamental Analysis and stock picking software, only keeps you stuck in trading equities. Trading this way, compounds concentration risk in one asset class and fails to adequately diversify risks across Equities, Bonds, Currencies and Commodities.Â  Thereâs much more to stock option trading, than stock itself.I cite Benjamin F. Kingâs study, quoted repeatedly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinging on to Fundamental Analysis and stock picking software, only keeps you stuck in trading equities. Trading this way, compounds concentration risk in one asset class and fails to adequately diversify risks across Equities, Bonds, Currencies and Commodities.Â  Thereâs much more to stock option trading, than stock itself.I cite Benjamin F. Kingâs study, quoted repeatedly since 1966, because it remains valid and has yet to be disproved to the point of dismissing its logic.Market and Industry Factors, Journal of Business, January 1966:Â  â Of a stockâs move &#8230; </p>
<p>There must be a more compelling reason for you to trade stock other than just for the movement, if only 20% is unique to the underlying equity in question.Â  Consider this, in context of the Fundamental Analysis or stock picking software that you bought on a per $1 basis.Â  For each $1 dollar you spend, you âoutsourcedâ the analysis at a cost of 80 cents, only to receive back 20 cents worth of work. Shouldnât the 80:20 rule of âoutsourcingâ be the other way round? The problem is that you are still stuck with 80% of the work, to analyze price movement!Â  Plus, the more you use FA techniques/stock picking software, the more trading capital is stuck in equities alone.Now, you can say âspecialâ research papers help you pick stocks.Â  Letâs have a look at some of the more common fundamental metrics in these research subscriptions:1. Dividend Yield: the problem is in the variability of yields as firms are in different stages of their business development.Â  A Mature company that dominates in a well established sub-segment/sector is able to afford a different dividend yield; versus, a Young company in a growth-oriented field; versus, a Small firm in a growing area that may not be able to afford a dividend payout.Â  Bear in mind there is nothing special about firms that pay a dividend.A company that gives away a portion of itâs retained earnings &#8211; which is what a dividend is &#8211; effectively gives away part of its valuation, which means it is not worth as much as a company that does need to give investors candy to commit capital to it.Â  So, a dividend paying stock has to be far superior to a non-dividend paying stock for reasons other than the dividend.Â  If it is not, thereâs no point looking for dividend paying products to trade, there are plenty of non-dividend paying Indexes to trade.2. Price/Book Ratio: the problem is this metric varies across industries and from company to company, as the asset base and capital structures of companies change over time. It lacks cross sector applicability and accounting complexity arises from a firmâs capital structure as it changes due to acquisitions/divestments/CAPEX for new product lines; or, product line cut-backs, as recently seen in the restructuring of major US car companies.3.Â  Price/Cash Flow Ratio (the cousin of the P/E): accounting laws on depreciation vary across Asia, Europe and US.Â  As accounting rules are driven by tax codes, which change considerably across regions despite adoption of global accounting standards, there is a lack of uniformity in homogenizing a fundamental ratio that will fit as a common benchmark across geographies. These metrics fail to help you compare say a Dell parented in the US to an Acer parented in Taiwan; but, is listed as an ADR in the US, even though both are competitors in the same sector as computer manufacturers. Furthermore, the current dislocated cost of capital in credit markets, impairs the ability of corporations to optimize the operating cost of their balance sheets.Â  In essence, corporations are left with the working capital cash flows remaining on their balance sheets, as testament to their financial strength. Do not waste your money on Fundamental Analysis software or research paper subscriptions.As there is a fundamental flaw in fundamental analysis and stock picking, how do you select trades?  Trade the options of a broad-based Equity Index to replace single stock exposure.Â  To replace Fundamental Analysis, use the Relative Strength measure based on Point &amp; Figure methods.What is Relative Strength?Â  It is nothing more than taking one price as the Numerator, divided by another price as the Denominator, then multiplied by 100.Â  RS = (Price 1 / Price 2) x 100.Â  Typically, RS calculations use daily closing prices.Â  Though simple in its mathematical construction, RS is ingeniously powerful when it is applied not only within a sector; but, across sectors and between asset classes.Letâs start of within a sector.Â  For example, if you choose 2 semiconductor stocks trading at different prices, how do you know if one stock is outperforming the other in the same sector, when the 2 stocks have price changes at different rates; plus, the sectorâs price itself is also changing?SOX = Semiconductor Sector Index, trades up from 452.24 to 467.81.Numerator1: Â Â Â  Â Price1 = BRCM 33.15Â Â  Â RS1 = 7.33Â Â  Â Price2 = 33.80Â Â  Â RS2 = 7.23Numerator2: Â Â Â  Â Price1Â  = TSM 9.91Â Â  Â RS1 = 2.19Â Â  Â Price2 = 13.43Â Â  Â RS2 = 2.87Common Denominator: Â Â Â  Â SOXÂ  Price 1 = 452.24Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Price 2 = 467.81BRCMâs RS1 = (33.15/452.24) x 100 = 7.33. BRCM&#8217;s RS2 = (33.80/467.81) x 100 = 7.23. Â TSMâs RS1 = (9.91/452.24) x 100 = 2.19.Â  TSM&#8217;s RS2 = (13.43/467.81) x 100 = 2.87.BRCM&#8217;s price rises from 33.15 to 33.80 and TSM&#8217;s price also rises from 9.91 to 13.43.Â  Simply because BRCM is a larger stock, does that mean it benefits from the SOX trading up? No, the RS reading (RS1 compared to RS2) shows BRCMâs RS reading dropped (7.33 down to 7.23) against TSMâs RS reading, which increased (2.19 to 2.87).Â  RS confirms TSM as the outperformer rising in price strength versus BRCMâs weakened price.Â  RS is constructed on pure price rules.Â  Using an Index as the denominator, acts as a much more durable benchmark and is structurally more reliable, compared to any âmagicalâ TA indicator; or, combination of income statements, balance sheets and cash flow statements touted in stock picking programmes.You can replace BRCM or TSM with Indexes or ETFs.Â  Using Indexes with Relative Strength enables a common denominator to compare Equities against Bonds, Commodities and Currencies, to crossover into asset classes other than stocks to trade.Â  Itâs not that Relative Strength is infallible.Â  But compared to the fundamental metrics cited above, Relative Strength fails the least.Â  Break the mould on what you learnt about stock option trading.Is there an example of an optionable and consistently profitable portfolio that trades using Relative Strength across multiple asset classes? Yes.Â  Follow the link below, entitled âConsistent Resultsâ to see a retail online option trading portfolio that excludes the use of single stocks and Fundamental Analysis, using broad based equity Indices, Commodity ETFs and Currency ETFs.Â  There is no need to trade FX directly. Just trade the options of Currency ETFs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-fundamental-flaw-in-fundamental-analysis-and-stock-picking/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Trade â Book Review &#8211; Kenneth L. Grant, Trading Risk</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managing Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Managing the performance of your trading account must go beyond the discipline of money management. While money management remains critical, it is a subset of the total picture of managing your trading accountâs profit and loss.That total picture is what Kenneth L. Grant aptly paints in his book, Trading Risk.Â  Total performance management of trading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managing the performance of your trading account must go beyond the discipline of money management. While money management remains critical, it is a subset of the total picture of managing your trading accountâs profit and loss.That total picture is what Kenneth L. Grant aptly paints in his book, Trading Risk.Â  Total performance management of trading must treat the profit and losses in a trading account at 2 levels â the portfolio level and at the individual trade level. Kenneth L. Grant is Cheyne Capitalâs Global Risk Manager and notable pioneer in designing risk control and capital allocation programs for global hedge funds.Â  Typically with most literature on risk management, you would expect complex numerical formulas beyond the reach of most retail traders who do not have a mathematical background.Â  Kenneth writes in a style that does emphasize the robustness of arithmetical reasoning, but helps you visualize the various types of risks with ample graphs. The content is not so numerically oriented that it is beyond the grasp of anyone who is comfortable with Statistics 101.There are adequate reader reviews on Amazon and Google Book Search, to help you decide if you will get the book. For those who have just started or are about to read the book, Iâve summarized the core concepts in the larger and essential chapters to help you get through them quicker.The number on the right of the title of the chapter is the number of pages contained within that chapter. It is not the page number.Â  The percentages represent how much each chapter makes up of the 244 pages in total, excluding appendices.Chapter 1:Â  The Risk Management Investment.Â  18,Â  7.38%.Chapter 2:Â  Setting Performance Objectives.Â  18,Â  7.38%.Chapter 3:Â  Understanding the Profit/Loss Patterns over Time.Â  44,Â  18.03%.Chapter 4:Â  The Risk Components of an Individual Portfolio.Â  28,Â  11.48%.Chapter 5:Â  Setting Appropriate Exposure Levels (Rule 1).Â  24,Â  9.84%.Chapter 6:Â  Adjusting Portfolio Exposure (Rule 2).Â  22,Â  9.02%.Chapter 7:Â  The Risk Components of an Individual Trade.Â  58,Â  23.77%.Chapter 8:Â  Bringing It on Home.Â  32,Â  13.11%.Focus on chapters 2, 3, 4 and 7, which makes up about 61% of the book. These chapters are relevant for practical trading purposes.Â  Here are the key points for these focus chapters, which Iâm summarizing from a retail option traderâs perspective. Chapter 2: Setting Performance Objectives. There are 3 types of targets to set at the portfolio level. </p>
<p>Chapter 3: Understanding the Profit/Loss Patterns over Time. This chapter evaluates the profit and loss in terms of Time Units (typically day and week) feeding into Time Spans, Average Profit versus Average Loss, Standard Deviation, Sharpe Ratio, Median P/L, Percentage of Winning Days versus Losing Days, Drawdown and Correlation Analysis. This section focuses on the core metrics of trade performance, for a given period: </p>
<p>In calculating the metrics, it becomes clear if your strengths are in trading long debit spreads, short credit spreads, directional trades (be it up/down) or non-directional trades. Trade in line with what you are intuitively profitable at, be that debit/credit spreads or directional/non-directional trades. The metrics help you guard against trading counter-intuitively in opposition to your strengths. Chapter 4: The Risk Components of an Individual Portfolio. The emphasis of this chapter is on Historical Volatility, Correlation and Implied Volatility and Value at Risk (VaR). While it is educational to understand how these various risks can be aggregated up into a single, portfolio measure of exposure, it is not useful for option traders trading retail portfolios from home.Â  Why?Â  To re-simulate the test scenarios on the portfolio cited in the text, requires specific types of data. The Account Statement of most retail option trading platforms only record each tradeâs profit, loss and date. The additional data of each dayâs Historical Volatility, Implied Volatility, Correlation coefficient values and Standard Deviation/Variance values will need to be sourced from outside the trading platform.Â  Unless you are trading multiple portfolios on behalf of other individuals, VaR simulations make sense. If you are trading just your own portfolio, it more useful to get an Implied Volatility tool that forecasts IV rising or falling by X% over 30-60-90-120 days.Â  This is a much more affordable way to assess the total impact of IV and Correlation in IV on your portfolio.Chapter 7: The Risk Components of an Individual Trade. The section to focus on here is the Core Transaction-Level Statistics. This includes the Trade Level P/L, Holding Period, Average P/L, Weighted Average P/L, Average Holding Period, P/L by Security or Asset Class and Long Side P/L versus Short Side P/L.Â  The main point here is to monetize the Average Holding Period of a long or short position. For example, as a guideline: </p>
<p>In conclusion, the critical points to focus on are the 3 types of targets at the portfolio level, the core metrics of trade performance, identifying your intuitive trading orientation and monetizing the average holding period of long and short trades for efficient trade turnover.Â  Translating these specific elements of trading risk into methods you can rely on every day, builds the required consistency in the profit and loss of your trading account. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Option Trading Basics</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-basics</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-basics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Stock Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learn To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Trading Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Options Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Stock Options Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trading Options]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-basics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those that are just starting out in learning how to trade options or trying to understand what options is, here is a list of explanations of what some of the most popular technical terms you will come across later in your trading career. 
Call option is a financial contract between two parties, the buyer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that are just starting out in learning how to trade options or trying to understand what options is, here is a list of explanations of what some of the most popular technical terms you will come across later in your trading career. </p>
<p>Call option is a financial contract between two parties, the buyer and the seller of this type of option. It is the option to buy shares of a stock at a specified time in the future. </p>
<p>The buyer of the option has the right, but not the obligation to buy an agreed quantity of a particular stock from the seller of the option at a certain time (the expiration date) for a certain price (the strike price). </p>
<p>However, the seller (or &#8220;writer&#8221;) is obligated to sell the stock should the buyer decides to exercise his/her right on the option. The buyer pays a fee (called a premium) for this right. </p>
<p>Put option is a financial contract between two parties, the seller (writer) and the buyer of the option. The buyer acquires a short position with the right, but not the obligation, to sell the stock at an agreed-upon price (the strike price).  If the buyer exercises his right to sell the option, the seller is obliged to buy it at the strike price. In exchange for selling his/her stock to the buyer, the buyer pays the writer a fee (the option premium). </p>
<p>Strike price, also referred to as exercise price is the price at which the owner of an option can purchase, in the case of a call, or sell, in the case of a put, the underlying stock. It&#8217;s the price at which the stock will be bought or sold when the option is exercised. </p>
<p>Premium is the price that buyer pays the seller for carrying the risk for the obligation.  This is similar to insurance premium where you pay the insurance company a premium, so in case if anything happens, the insurance company is obligated to compensate the damage.  The price of the premium depends on many different factors such as strike price, time left until expiration date, interest rate, volatility, etc. </p>
<p>Expiration Date – Options is a wasting asset, meaning that it loses value as time goes by.  Once the option expires, the option no longer has any value and become worthless.  The expiration date is found in each option contract when it is bought. </p>
<p>American Style and European Style Option – There are two different types of options.  American style option is one where buyers can choose to exercise the option any time up until the expiration date whereas the European style option is where buyers can only exercise on the expiration date. </p>
<p>These are just some of the most common terms you will come across when starting out in option trading.  If you are serious about learning how to trade options, then you should adhere to some of the common option trading tips that every option trader would abide by.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-basics/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Options Trading â Portfolio Measures and Trade Performance Metrics</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/online-options-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-portfolio-measures-and-trade-performance-metrics</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/online-options-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-portfolio-measures-and-trade-performance-metrics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Options Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/online-options-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-portfolio-measures-and-trade-performance-metrics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reward of Profit and the Risk of Losses for retail option trading needs to be managed at 2 related levels of performance: Portfolio and Trade Specific.At the Portfolio level for online options trading, there are 3 types of Targets that must be set, even before you trade.Maximum Return Target: complete achievement of the âidealâ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reward of Profit and the Risk of Losses for retail option trading needs to be managed at 2 related levels of performance: Portfolio and Trade Specific.At the Portfolio level for online options trading, there are 3 types of Targets that must be set, even before you trade.Maximum Return Target: complete achievement of the âidealâ measure. Dream of the âidealâ that stretches you beyond what is practical. For example, earn 2-3 times your monthly living expenses with the monthly trading profit. This is to stretch your imagination well beyond mediocrity. Even if you fail, you just might end up with more than your original target.Minimum Return Target: the lowest acceptable measure, achievable under most conditions, excluding a catastrophic market event. Use the historical annualized return of the S&amp;P 500 between 10%-12% (prior to the 2008 financial pandemic), as the lowest acceptable boundary.Â  The S&amp;P 500 being a widely accepted benchmark for trading equities is adequate to base the minimum target off, though your portfolio needs to be profitable â being ahead of the $SPX in negative territory does not count.Â  Below the historical annualized return range of 10%â12%, is the 3 Month T-Bill, presently near zero.Â  While the T-bill theoretically represents an âabsolutelyâ zero risk investment, even the safest investments will still carry a residual amount of risk no matter how small that risk is.Â  The point is this.Â  You got into options and all that Greek terminology, not to make salads; but to beat the performance of equities as an asset class.Â  If your portfolio&#8217;s return is between what is near zero-risk and 10%â12% per annum, you are just delaying reaching a point of pain that marks failure in grasping the base-line ability to control risks.Â  If the returns of your portfolio are between 0%â12% and you plan to continue trading options, processes within your trading process will need to be reâengineered.&#8221;Halt Trade&#8221; Target: cumulative losses reach an absolute amount below the Minimum Return, making it necessary to stop trading altogether for a stated period.Â  10% of [(60% x Cash Balance at the start of the year); or Net Liquidating Value].Â  Example, for a $50,000 trading account, 10% x (60% x $50,000) = $3,000 of losses in total, is the absolute amount to halt trading.Â  Why 10%? Blowing up your self-funded capital is final.Â  There is no bail out package, as a home options trading business does not have access to bank loans; or, shareholdersâ equity to finance your personal trades.Now, drilling down to Trade Specific performance measures.Even before you calculate the metrics, characteristically, what makes for a consistently managed portfolio are these traits: </p>
<p>Where can I see this step up function in a consistently profitable portfolio, with these portfolio measures and trade performance metrics? Follow the link below, entitled âConsistent Resultsâ to see a model retail option traderâs portfolio that shows these traits.Moving onto the hard metrics.Â  Thereâs 2 ways to count the Return on your trading capital. </p>
<p>In both cases, you can minus the Total Cost of Commissions from Total Profit, to get a Total Net Profit number.Â  The, divide the Total Net Profit by the Start of Year Cash Balance; or, Net Liquidating Value.Â  Net Liquidating Value is how much your entire trading account is worth, which is equal to Total Cash + Options Value + Stocks Value + Commodities Value + Bonds Value. The Start of Year Cash Balance is straightforward â it is the money in the account at the beginning of that trading year. Cash increases when you are short securities; but, cash decreases, as you get long on securities.To review your performance, calculate these metrics using the Profit (wins) and Loss (losers) from your account: </p>
<p>The Average Win divided by the Average Loss measures how RESPONSIVE you are in taking profits and cutting losses.Combine the Accuracy ratio with the Responsiveness ratio to get your Performance Ratio.Performance Ratio = (Win/Loss Probability) x (Average Win / Average Loss).Â  Always aim to maintain the Performance Ratio above 1.00. Why?Â  The commonly known money management rule is to allocate 2%-5% of (60% x Net Liquidating Value of the account) per trade.Â  What is not commonly practiced is the discipline of moderating a +/- 1% in trade allocation between the 2%-5% allocation. </p>
<p>This is how to achieve a ladder effect in stepping up profits and stepping down losses. This mechanism of stepping up/down is an indispensable tool for rewarding profit and to discipline the risk of losses.Â  It forces you to improve both ACCURACY and RESPONSIVENESS before raising your position size. </p>
<p>Where can I learn more about portfolio measures and trade performance metrics as part of a total trading system? Follow the link below, for 55 hours of video-based learning of online options trading from home. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/online-options-trading-a%c2%80%c2%93-portfolio-measures-and-trade-performance-metrics/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Options Trading Strategies â Wrong Use of Historical Volatility and Implied Volatility Crossovers</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-wrong-use-of-historical-volatility-and-implied-volatility-crossovers</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-wrong-use-of-historical-volatility-and-implied-volatility-crossovers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volatility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-wrong-use-of-historical-volatility-and-implied-volatility-crossovers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not all volatilities are constructed equal.Â  It is critical to differentiate between Historical Volatility and Implied Volatility, so retail traders learn how to trade options focused on what is material to theoretically price option spreads forward.Historical Volatility (HV) measures past price movements of the underlying asset recording the asset&#8217;s actual or realized volatility.Â  The more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all volatilities are constructed equal.Â  It is critical to differentiate between Historical Volatility and Implied Volatility, so retail traders learn how to trade options focused on what is material to theoretically price option spreads forward.Historical Volatility (HV) measures past price movements of the underlying asset recording the asset&#8217;s actual or realized volatility.Â  The more commonly known type of HV is Statistical Volatility, which computes the underlying assets return over a finite but adjustable number of days.Â  Let me explain what âfinite but adjustableâ means.Â  You can vary the number of days to measure the Statistical Volatility: for example, 5-10-50-200 days, thatâs how time-based moving averages and momentum/oscillator studies are built.Â  Though, it is not the case with Implied Volatility.Implied Volatility measures expected values by repetitively refining bid-ask estimates.Â  These estimates are based on the expectations of buyers and sellers. The buyers and sellers (85+% of floor traded volume is driven by institutions, floor traders and market makers) behind the bid and ask values, who do change their estimates within the day, as new information be it macro-economic news or micro-economic data impacting the underlying product becomes available.Â  What is being estimated is the underlying assetâs future fluctuation with certain assumptions embedded into the changes in information of the underlying.Â  That refinement of bid-ask estimates must be completed within finite time-bound option expiration periods. Thatâs why there are monthly and quarterly option expiration cycles. You cannot change these expiration periods, either by shortening or lengthening the number of days, to âconstructâ a time period that gives you faster or slower crossover indicators.Why point out the wrong use of Historical Volatility and Implied Volatiity Crossovers? It is to caution you against the defective use ofÂ  HV-IV crossovers, which is not a reliable trading signal.Â  Remember, for a given expiration month, there can only be one volatility over that specific period.Â  Implied Volatility must leave from where it is currently trading at, to converge at zero on expiration date. Implied Volatility (be it IV for ITM, ATM or OTM strikes) must return to zero on expiry; but, price can go anywhere (up, down or stay flat).To continually sell âoverpricedâ and buy âunder pricedâ options would eventually cause the implied volatility of every single non-zero bid option to line up exactly.Â  Meaning the phenomenon of IVâs âsmilingâ skew disappears, as IV becomes perfectly flat. This hardly happens, especially in highly liquid products. Take for example, the SPY, a broad-based Index; or, GLD â the SPDR Shares ETF in a fast market like Gold. With open interest at the non-zero bid strikes going into the thousands and tens of thousands, do you really think a retail off the floor trader is going to be allowed to âout priceâ the professional hedger on the floor?Â  Unlikely. Calls and Puts in highly liquid products, are like items in an inventory with high supply because there is high demand.Â  This type of inventory does not get âmispricedâ because floor traders have to make a daily living from trading the Calls and Puts âthey will refuse to carry the risk of mispricing overnight.So, what are the key considerations to banking in your edge as a retail trader?  </p>
<p>Where can I learn how to trade options with consistent profits focused on Implied Volatility without Historical Volatility? Follow the link below, entitled âConsistent Resultsâ to see a model retail option traderâs portfolio that excludes the use of HV and focuses on trading only IV. Iâll cite these actual historical events, to bolster the argument for removing Historical Volatility from your trading process altogether.27 Feb, 2007: Widespread Panic from the sizeable China sell-off in equities. If you were trading the options of an index like the FXI which is the iShares product of Chinaâs 25 largest and most liquid Chinese companies though listed in the US; but they are headquartered in China, you would have been impacted. While you can argue itâs possible to have market events recreate the ranges of the Dow, Nasdaq &amp; S&amp;P, how do you recreate the scenario of the VIX and VXN soaring 59% and 39%?22Jan, 2008: Fed cuts rates by 75 basis points prior to the scheduled policy meeting on Jan 30th, whereby the FOMC cut another 50 basis points on the date of the meeting.Â  If you were trading interest-rate sensitive sectors using the options on a Financial ETF or a Banking Index like the BKX; or, the Housing Index like the HGX, you would have been impacted. And in the current environment of rates being near zero, the FOMC while they still have a rate policy tool, they are unable to cut rates by the same number of basis points like before. What was a historical event is not successively repeatable going forward, not until rates are raised again and subsequently they get cut again.Question: How do you reconstruct history?Â  That is the history of events forming Historical Volatility.Â  The answer is in the real examples cited, as with any other financially related historical event &#8211; you cannot reconstruct history. You may be able to mimic parts of HV but you cannot repeat it in its entirety.Â  So, if you continue using HV-IV crossovers, you visually confuse yourself by searching for volatility âmispricingâ patterns that you would like to see; but, you will end up with poor profit performance instead.Â  It makes more practical trading sense to focus purely on IV; then, diversify the trading of volatilities across multiple asset classes beyond equities.Where can I learn more about trading IV across multiple asset classes using only options, without having to own stock? Follow the link below (video-based course), that uses IV Mean Reversion/Mean Repulsion and IV Forecasting, as reliable methods to trade the implied volatilities across broad-based Equity Indexes, Commodity ETFs, Currency ETFs and Emerging Market ETFs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-wrong-use-of-historical-volatility-and-implied-volatility-crossovers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Options Trading Strategies &#8211; Book Review &#8211; Sheldon Natenberg, Option Volatility and Pricing</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Natenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volatility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with most books on the topic of how to trade options, the amount of material to get through can be daunting. For example, with Sheldon Natenberg’s Option Volatility &#38; Pricing, it is about 418 pages to digest.  There are adequate reader reviews on Amazon and Google Book Search, to help you decide if you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most books on the topic of how to trade options, the amount of material to get through can be daunting. For example, with Sheldon Natenberg’s Option Volatility &amp; Pricing, it is about 418 pages to digest.  There are adequate reader reviews on Amazon and Google Book Search, to help you decide if you will get the book. For those who have just started or are about to read the book, I’ve summarized the core concepts in the larger and essential chapters to help you get through them quicker.The number on the right of the title of the chapter is the number of pages contained within that chapter. It is not the page number.  The percentages represent how much each chapter makes up of the 418 pages in total, excluding appendices.1  The Language of Options.  12, 2.87%.2  Elementary Strategies.  22, 5.26%.3  Introduction to Theoretical Pricing Models.  16, 3.83%.4  Volatility.  30, 7.18%.5  Using an Option&#8217;s Theoretical Value.  14, 3.35%.6  Option Values and Changing Market Conditions.  32, 7.66%.7  Introduction to Spreading.  10, 2.39%.8  Volatility Spreads.  36, 8.61%.9  Risk Considerations.  26, 6.22%.10  Bull and Bear Spreads.  14, 3.35%.11  Option Arbitrage.  28, 6.70%.12  Early Exercise of American Options.  16, 3.83%.13  Hedging with Options.  16, 3.83%.14  Volatility Revisited.  28, 6.70%.15  Stock Index Futures and Options.  30, 7.18%.16  Intermarket Spreading.  22, 5.26%.17  Position Analysis.  32, 7.66%.18  Models and the Real World.  34, 8.13%.Focus on chapters 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 17 and 18, which makes up about 66% of the book.  These chapters are relevant for practical trading purposes. Here are the key points for these focus chapters, which I’m summarizing from a retail option trader’s perspective.4  Volatility. Volatility as a measure of speed in context of price in/stability for a given product in a particular market.  Despite its shortcomings, the definition of volatility still defaults to these assumptions of the Black-Scholes Model: 1. Price changes of  a product remain random and cannot be engineered, making it impossible to predict price direction prior to its movement. 2. Percent changes in the product’s price are normally distributed.  3. As the product’s price percent changes are counted as continuously compounded, the product’s price on expiry will become lognormally distributed.  4. The lognormal distribution’s mean (mean reversion) is to be found in the product’s forward price.6  Option Values and Changing Market Conditions.  Use of Delta in its 3 equivalent forms: Rate of Change, Hedge Ratio &amp; Theoretical Equivalent of the  Position.  Treatment of Gamma as an option&#8217;s curvature to explain the opposite relationship of OTM/ITM strikes to the ATM strike having the highest Gamma. Dealing with the Theta-Gamma inverse relationship, as well as Theta being intertwined synthetically as long decay and short premium with Implied Volatility, as measured by Vega.8  Volatility Spreads. Emphasis is on the sensitivities of a Ratio Back Spread, Ratio Vertical Spread, Straddle/Strangle, Butterfly, Calendar, and Diagonal to Interest Rates, Dividends and the 4 Greeks with specific attention on the effects of Gamma and Vega.9  Risk Considerations. A sobering reminder to select spreads with the lowest aggregate risk spread versus the highest probability of profit.  Aggregate Risk as measured in terms of Delta (Directional Risk), Gamma (Curvature Risk), Theta (Decay/Premium Risk) and Vega (Volatility Risk).11  Option Arbitrage. Synthetic positions are explained in terms of manufacturing an equivalent risk profile of the original spread, using a mix of single options, other spreads and the underlying product. Clear caution that transforming trades into Conversions, Reversals and Adjustments are not risk-free; but, may raise the trade&#8217;s nearer-term risks even though the longer-term net risk is lowered.  There are material differences in the cash flows of being long options versus short options, arising from the Skew bias unique to a product and the interest rate built into Calls making them disparate against Puts.14  Volatility Revisited.  Different expiry cycles between near-term versus longer-term options creates a longer-term volatility average, a mean volatility.   When volatility rises above its mean, there is relative certainty that it will revert to its mean. Likewise, mean reversion is highly likely as volatility drops below its mean. Gyration around the mean is an identifiable characteristic. Discernible volatility traits make it essential to forecast volatility in 30 day periods: 30-60-90-120 days, give the typical term to be short credit spreads between 30-45 and long debit spreads between 90-120 days.  Reconciling Implied Volatility as a measure of consensus volatility of all buyer/sellers for a given product, with inconsistencies in Historical Volatility and predictive constraints of Future Volatility.15  Stock Index Futures and Options. Effective use of Indexing to remove single stock risk.  Distinct treatment of the risks for stock-settled Indexes (including impact of dividend/exercise) separate from cash-settled Indices (absent of dividend/exercise).  Explains logic for Theoretically Pricing the options on Stock Index Futures, in addition to pricing the Futures contract itself, to determine which is economically viable to trade &#8211; the Futures contract itself or the options on the Futures.17  Position Analysis.  A more robust method than just eye balling the Delta, Gamma, Vega and Theta of a position is to use the relevant Theoretical Pricing model (Bjerksund-Stensland, Black-Scholes, Binomial) to scenario test for changes in dates (daily/weekly) before expiration, % changes in Implied Volatility and price changes within and near +/- 1 Standard Deviation. These factors feeding the scenario tests, once graphed, reveal the relative ratios of Delta/Gamma/Vega/Theta risks in terms of their proportionality impacting the Theoretical Price of specific strikes making up the construction of a spread.18  Models and the Real World. Addresses the weaknesses of these core assumptions used in a traditional pricing model: 1. Markets are not frictionless: buying/selling an underlying contract has restrictions in terms of tax implications, limitation on funding and transaction costs. 2. Interest rates are variable, not constant over the option&#8217;s life. 3. Volatilty is variable, not constant over the options&#8217; life. 4. Trading is not continous 24/7 &#8211; there are exchange holidays resulting in gaps in price changes.  5. Volatility is linked to Theoretical Price of the underlying contract, not independent of it. 6. Percentage of price changes in an underlying contract does not result in a lognormal distribution  of underlying prices at distribution due to Skew &amp; Kurtosis.To conclude, reading these chapters is not academic. Understanding techniques discussed in the chapters must enable you to answer the following key questions.  In the total inventory of your trading account, if you are … </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Differences Between Insurance Policy and Option Contract</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/the-differences-between-insurance-policy-and-option-contract</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/the-differences-between-insurance-policy-and-option-contract#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[option strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Trading Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[options strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Stra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/the-differences-between-insurance-policy-and-option-contract</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Options are attractive to the private trader due to their special advantages. By buying options, you are given the opportunity to participating in the market with limited known risk. Besides, the capital that you need to invest is just a small fraction of the price of the underlying shares. Option buyer need to pay a premium when buying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Options are attractive to the private trader due to their special advantages. By buying options, you are given the opportunity to participating in the market with limited known risk. Besides, the capital that you need to invest is just a small fraction of the price of the underlying shares. Option buyer need to pay a premium when buying options, which is very much less than the stock prices.   </p>
<p>For those who are not familiar how actually options work, it may be a little bit confusing in the beginning. Options actually share a lot of same characteristics like insurance policies, which most people should be able to understand. We will get a clearer picture of how literally options work by checking through the features that options and insurance policies have.   </p>
<p>For an insurance policy, the policy is actually a contract between the purchaser and the underwriter of the insurance policy. Underwriter of the insurance policy is the company, whose sells the policy. Whereas; option is a contract between the option buyer and seller when there is an initial transaction taking place. Stated in the contract, option buyer has the right to buy an amount of stock from the seller at an agree price within a specific period of time; whereas, seller has to obligate to sell an amount of stock to the buyer at an agree price within a specific period of time.  This agreed price is called strike price.   </p>
<p>For insurance policy, purchaser pays a premium to the insurance underwriter. The probability payout is influenced by a number of factors, which the premium is dependent. Premium will be charged higher if the risk payout is higher. Whereas for option; purchaser of the option contract pays premium to the writer of the option. A number of factors, which will affect the overall likelihood of a particular stock price being reached, will also affect the amount that needed to be paid as a premium. When the premium for the option is higher, the likelihood of a stock price can reached also higher.  </p>
<p>In term of time period, the validity of the insurance policy is within a specific length of time. The passing of time works in favour to the insurance underwriter but against to the purchaser of the insurance policy. For option, it works exactly same as the insurance policy, that is option contract is valid within a specific length of time. When the time passes, it does not favour to the option buyer but favour to option writer.   </p>
<p>Upfront is the risk for the purchaser of the insurance contract. The policy is paid by the premium. The insurance underwriter risk is open-ended depending on the terms that are insured. In options trading, the options buyer risk is also known as upfront. The option is paid by the premium. Here are the differences between insurance policy and the option. The option buyer can gain more than premium that he or she has paid for the option but not less than the premium. On the other hand, option writer has open-ended risk potential, which may cause unlimited loss.   </p>
<p>In term of payout, if there is any event that has been stated in the insurance policy has occurred, the payout from the insurance company will be a lot more than the original premium paid. If the market direction favours the option buyer, then he or she has unlimited profit potential. The option buyer may make a lot of money, which is many times more than the premium that he or she has been paid.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/the-differences-between-insurance-policy-and-option-contract/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Trade Options â Diversified Trading Stock Options but Still Suffering Concentration Risk</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Applying a more complete definition of diversification can help retail option traders diversify their portfolio profitably, beyond equities.A buddy started online options trading from home, in the last 6 months. He was trading a mix of Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors using highly liquid Indexes but was failing to get consistent profits.Â  Naturally, I asked, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applying a more complete definition of diversification can help retail option traders diversify their portfolio profitably, beyond equities.A buddy started online options trading from home, in the last 6 months. He was trading a mix of Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors using highly liquid Indexes but was failing to get consistent profits.Â  Naturally, I asked, âWhich Indexes?âHe answered, âDJX, DIA, MNX, QQQQ, RUT, SMH, SPY and XSP.Â  Iâve incorporated broad-based Indexing across large, mid and small-cap stocks to remove single stock exposure.Â  Having learnt how to trade options with Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors, Iâm spreading across these various Indexes. Iâm being careful with money management, 2%-5% per trade, Iâve diversified risk, yes?âNo. He has partially diversified a portion within his portfolio; but, is still suffering concentration risk.Â  All he has really done is allocate capital across multiple products, using various option spread types; yet, all his trading capital is stuck in equities.In choosing the MNX, QQQQ, SMH, SPY and XSP, there is a duplication of stock components in these Indexes: for example, AMAT (Applied Materials) is a component of all 5 Indexes.Â  Bear in mind the MNX and the QQQQ are both smaller versions of the Nasdaq100 Index, the only difference being the MNX is an European styled cash settled Index and the cubes (QQQQ) is an American style stock settled Index.Â  Another example, Apple (AAPL) is a component of the MNX/QQQQ and SPY/XSP &#8211; both the SPY and the XSP track the S&amp;P 500, the SPY is American style stock settled and the XSP is European style cash settled.Â  Duplication is not diversification.Â  Even if you allocated capital to the smaller versions of the Dow: DJX, the European style cash settled version of the DIA which is the American style stock settled version.Â  Moreover, if you extended capital allocation to trade the RUT, thinking you are diversifying into small-cap stocks and away from large-caps, you just sunk more of your trading capital into equities.Â  Again, you cannot achieve diversification by adding more capital in the same asset class.Â  That is concentration risk in stocks. Do not confuse asset category (market capitalization) with asset class.Why bother diversifying across Asset Classes? To answer this question, Iâll use an example of a well known traded stock:Â  Apple (AAPL).Â  You wonât need to understand Fundamental Analysis to follow the reasoning.Summarizing a financial extract from its Annual Report, Apple has almost ~30% of its Net Sales distributed across: UK, France, Germany, Spain &amp; Ireland and Japan.Â  Appleâs customers in Europe are paying in EUR/GBP and customers in Japan will be paying in JPY.Â  Even though you are trading Apple directly as a US parented firm listed in the US and the currency of the parent is USD denominated, the company has currency exposure to the EUR/GBP and JPY arising from operating sales entities in those jurisdictions.Â  So, you are already exposed to currency and geographic risks by choosing Apple as a product to trade, even though you are constructing an option trade on the stock.So, it makes sense, rather than have these exposures wrapped inside the stock, where you are subordinating non-equity risks to the stock, to deliberately surface the risks in Geography, Commodities and Currencies.Â  Then, isolate these elements and trade them directly using optionable Geographic ETFs, Commodity ETFs and Currency ETFs.Is there an example of a consistently profitable and diversified portfolio to see the merits of trading options beyond equities? Yes.Â  Follow the link below, entitled âConsistent Resultsâ to learn how to trade options using a multi-asset class set up.Â  Notice how the profits step up gradually, from the mid hundreds to the higher hundreds; then, from the higher hundreds into the thousands.Â  While, the losses are contained within the mid to lower hundreds.Â  Diversification to trade options in non-stock asset classes using Geographic ETFs, Commodity ETFs and Currency ETFs, deliberately dilutes the concentration risk in the portfolioâs P/L.If you are puzzled, yet intrigued, you may well ask, âI donât need to Beta-weight the Deltas of my option positions; then, hedge using Futures?Â  Do I need to adjust my existing positions by embedding single options; or, morph the original spread into a hybrid option strategy?âNo, is the answer to both questions. Just as it would not make sense within stocks to say Beta-weight a company like GE to the SMH (Semiconductors Holdrs), there is even less sense to Beta-weight a broad-based Index like the SPY to an Emerging Market ETF, Commodity ETF or Currency ETF.Â  Diversification is designed to break the commonality in correlation between the asset price movements of products, in the retail traderâs portfolio structured for online options trading.Â  Adjustments fail to provide the consistency in laddering up the profits as seen in the portfolio, because an adjusted trade often fails to restore, let alone improve the original profile of the tradeâs volatility and probability that was bought or sold.How is this possible? Volatility can be added to/reduced from the portfolio, as not all Asset Classes or Sectors or Individual Companies or Countries move up/down in value ALL at the same time; and/or, ALL at the same rate. It is the volatility level across various asset classes that is targeted for diversification.To conclude, hereâs the point to reflect on.Â  While diversification alone does not guarantee a profitable portfolio, do you think you are diversified trading stock options but still suffering concentration risk? Think deeper. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Trade Options &#8211; Book Review &#8211; Lawrence G. McMillan, McMillan on Options</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-book-review-lawrence-g-mcmillan-mcmillan-on-options</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-book-review-lawrence-g-mcmillan-mcmillan-on-options#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Mcmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volatility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-book-review-lawrence-g-mcmillan-mcmillan-on-options</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry McMillan is an iconic Hercules of the options world.  Few option titans have the depth and range of grounded insights to devote 630+ pages to a publication.  Do not be overwhelmed by what initially appears as a titanic chronicle.McMillan commits extensive effort to clarify the proper use of misused trading terms.  He rectifies inaccurate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry McMillan is an iconic Hercules of the options world.  Few option titans have the depth and range of grounded insights to devote 630+ pages to a publication.  Do not be overwhelmed by what initially appears as a titanic chronicle.McMillan commits extensive effort to clarify the proper use of misused trading terms.  He rectifies inaccurate practices by applying the mechanics of the math that is material and helps you visualize this with graphically rich worked examples.  Every chapter has its own summary, emphasizing specific techniques to refine your own trading methods.There are adequate reader reviews on Amazon and Google Book Search, to help you decide if you will get the book. For those who have just started or are about to read the book, I’ve summarized the core concepts in the larger and essential chapters to help you get through them quicker.The number on the right of the title of the chapter is the number of pages contained within that chapter. It is not the page number.  The percentages represent how much each chapter makes up of the 630 pages in total, excluding appendices.1  Option History, Definitions, and Terms.  44, 6.98%.2  An Overview of Option Strategies.  60, 9.52%.3  The Versatile Option.  82, 13.02%.4  The Predictive Power of Options.  164, 26.03%.5  Trading Systems and Strategies.  90, 14.29%.6  Trading Volatility and Other Theoretical Approaches.  128, 20.32%.7  Other Important Considerations.  48, 7.62%.Focus on chapters 4, 5 and 6, which makes up about 61% of the book. These chapters are relevant for practical trading purposes.  Here are the key points for these focus chapters, which I’m summarizing from a retail option trader’s perspective. 4 The Predictive Power of Options. Within this chapter, focus on these sections: Using Stock Option Volume as an Indicator, Implied Volatility Can Predict a Change of Trend and The Put–Call Ratio.  Here, you are taught to spot trading opportunities where the daily total option volume is more than double the average option volume. For highly liquid Index products, a higher ratio is required.  There are filters to validate the use of volume speculation.  These filters include ruling out the impact of arbitrage, total volume concentrated in too few strikes that are not identifiable as block trades, spread trades concentrated in just two series of strikes and over concentration of daily volume in ITM strikes that does not have the percentage leverage of ATM/OTM strikes.The section on Implied Volatility evaluates the treatment of IV as it moves between its expected ranges towards extreme boundaries.  IV Mean Reversion is involved. Implied Volatility must leave from where it is currently trading at (be it IV for ITM, ATM or OTM strikes), to converge at zero on expiration date.  Though, price can go anywhere (up, down or stay flat).  The boundary analysis of IV is applied to covered call writing, index options, the seasonality of volatility and trading volatility directly using the VIX.  Other volatility companion measures should be used in combination with the VIX, namely the VXO, QQV and VXN as sentiment gauges.McMillan differentiates between a “standard” put-call ratio versus the “dollar-weighted” put-call ratio. There is further refinement on the applicability of specific ratios to equity only put-call ratios, distinct from index put-call ratios and futures put-call ratios.  Weighted ratios accentuate the extremities of overbought/oversold conditions when sentiment has reached its peak or valley to signal impending changes, which is overlooked in using a standard ratio that is not weighted.  Sentiment needs to be sensitized with the weightage.5 Trading Systems and Strategies. Pay attention to these sections, which make up about 68% of the chapter: Intermarket Spreads and Other Seasonal Tendencies. The section covers European options that do trade at a discount to parity, spread differentials between heating oil futures and unleaded gas futures, small-cap outperformance with the January effect, spread differentials between gold stocks versus the price of gold, spread differentials between oil stocks versus the price of oil, the relationship between the utilities sector and 30-year bonds, other relationships between sector indexes/futures and Pairs Trading.  There is convergence and divergence at work in these specific products and asset classes identified. For a unique set of relationships, McMillan clearly explains why some relationships must be treated as cross-correlated dependencies versus independent treatment of non-correlated mutually exclusive events. There is also clarity on how to design your trading system to collectively control the diversification of risks across these distinct linear relationships and inverse interplays.The section on Other Seasonal Tendencies challenges August as a dull month with muted volatility in the pits, alerts you to September-October as months to be long puts but short futures and identifies cyclical periods of rallies in late October and late January. McMillan confronts the conventional reasons for seasonal nuances. For example, the traditional leave periods of floor traders/market makers/institutions who move 85+% of exchange volume does not dampen volatility in the pits and there is no slack during the Labour Day holiday period. He blends the business cycle in with the use of seasonality. For example, companies that are stock components of the S&amp;P 500 with cash rich balance sheets will need to periodically slim down their current asset holdings and redeploy cash into longer-term investments. Firms must maximize shareholder’s equity and cannot just sit on cash.  McMillan explains when and how to position your trades in view of the common market practice of “window dressing”, in context of cash flow contraction and the velocity of money during these periods of fiscal adjustments to the books of corporations.6 Trading Volatility and Other Theoretical Approaches.  In brief, the themes covered are: volatility’s role in pricing options, controlling directional risk with delta neutral trading, predicting volatility based on forecasting IV from its current percentile, comparing historical and implied volatility to confirm trading ranges in percentile terms, trading implied volatility recognizing the trade off between being short premium versus long decay, reaffirming the relevance of the Black Scholes model with application of the Greeks, aligning a spread’s strike construction for trading the volatility skew, the aggressive calendar spread that expires within 10 days versus conventional inter-month calendars, using probability and statistics in volatility trading to rank the risk to reward profile of trades and expected return metrics to measure risk per $1 allocated.Of all the focus chapters, Chapter 6 is the heaviest on the use of numerical reasoning. Though, is not beyond anyone who is comfortable with Statistics 101.To complete the review, here’s the background of the author.  Larry is the President of McMillan Analysis Corporation, founded in 1991.  From 1982 to 1989, he headed up the Equity Arbitrage Department at Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc. He traded the firm&#8217;s own money primarily in advanced option spreads and risk arbitrage strategies.  Between 1989-90, he was in charge of the Proprietary Option Trading Department at Prudential-Bache Securities. He traded primarily convertible Euro-bonds and Japanese warrant arbitrage strategies.  Prior to these roles, he was the retail option strategist at Thomson McKinnon from 1976 to 1980, and traded the firm&#8217;s proprietary account beginning in 1980.  He initially worked at Bell Telephone Laboratories from 1972 to 1976.  He holds an M.S. in applied mathematics and computer science.In conclusion, McMillan on Options exposes you to the full gamut of how to trade options and the essential methods required to build a sustainable and consistent trading system. Intermarket spreading and Implied Volatility forecasting are clearly the cornerstones of a solid trading system.This is not a criticism of the book but a personal observation. To complete the construction of a total trading system requires the metrics for portfolio diagnostics. I have written a separate article, entitled “Book Review -  Kenneth L. Grant, Trading Risk” that deals with portfolio management. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/how-to-trade-options-book-review-lawrence-g-mcmillan-mcmillan-on-options/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stock Option Trading &#8211; Paradox &#8211; More Trades on Dull Days and Normal Days than Big Days</title>
		<link>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-paradox-more-trades-on-dull-days-and-normal-days-than-big-days</link>
		<comments>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-paradox-more-trades-on-dull-days-and-normal-days-than-big-days#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Ranges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-paradox-more-trades-on-dull-days-and-normal-days-than-big-days</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrast these 2 days.  29 Sep, 2008: Dow down -7.50%, Nasdaq down -10.06% and S&#38;P 500 down -9.63%.  Versus 13 Nov, 2008: Dow up +6.25%, Nasdaq up +6.11% and S&#38;P 500 up +6.47%.  Many retail option traders would have rushed to get their spreads filled on such big days, either to get short or long.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrast these 2 days.  29 Sep, 2008: Dow down -7.50%, Nasdaq down -10.06% and S&amp;P 500 down -9.63%.  Versus 13 Nov, 2008: Dow up +6.25%, Nasdaq up +6.11% and S&amp;P 500 up +6.47%.  Many retail option traders would have rushed to get their spreads filled on such big days, either to get short or long.  The discerning few, mindful that a +/- X% change in equities, is a day to avoid entry; instead, it is a signal to scale-off profits or reduce exposure, would have profited or limited losses on such days.Here’s the logic for categorizing what type of day it is. If you theoretically priced a long Calendar or a short Iron Condor on a Big Day – be it up or down, it is likely the product’s price has moved near or outside 1 Standard Deviation, even if the order was filled at mid-price for that spread.The following day, if conditions turned into a Dull Day be it up or down, let’s say the Futures did not even move more than a third within 1 Standard Deviation.  On the extreme day when you priced the entry, even though you were filled at mid-price, you still overpaid for the Calendar; or, sold more Theta as premium than is necessary to protect the wing span of the short Iron Condor, possibly increasing the risk of Gamma instability.  Alternatively, if you priced a directional spread on a Big Day, be it a Short Vertical or a Long Vertical you need a continuation in extreme days &#8211; after the Big Day that you filled the order on, for price to move. If price has already moved 68% (1 Standard Deviation) on a Big Day, moving towards 2 or 3 Standard Deviations is not the problem.  The issue is – can the price action sustain a 2 or 3 Standard Deviation move day after day, after the extreme day? It’s not an impossible event, just an infrequent occurrence.Pricing spreads for entry under extreme conditions, places huge pressure on your orders to outperform.  That’s a tough way to trade.  You are punishing the Profit and Loss of the trading account unnecessarily.  Psychologically and visually, continually entering trades on Big Days makes you search for  “magical” chart patterns for another huge breakout or breakdown in price.  No, you won’t go blind.  Though, you will cultivate a trading habit that must be broken, if you plan to have consistent results with online options trading.So, how do you work out the X% change, be it up or down to differentiate a Dull Day, from a Normal Day versus a Big Day?  Use the implied volatility of the front month’s options on the DJX, MNX and SPY – the mini versions of the Dow, Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500 respectively, to categorize the market ranges of the day. For example, take the: </p>
<p>You can apply this calculation to the VIX, or any optionable product that you have identified a trade on.Why divide the front month’s volatility by 16?  As you know, volatility is expressed as an annualized number.  So, to get the daily volatility number, we divide it by the square root of the number of trading days in a year, which is 256 (rounded off).  There is no trading on weekends and exchange holidays, because prices cannot change on these days.  There are some years with more or less than 256 days, but using 256 is the norm.  The square root of 256 = 16. As part of your pre-market preparation, calculate on a spreadsheet the market ranges of the day (Dull, Normal or Big) for the DJX, MNX, SPY and the VIX at minimum. This is not to pick direction, as you will not know if the market will open to the upside/downside and STAY there, even if futures indicate an upside/downside bias. The calculation gives you a measured gauge, once the market opens to see if the trading range of the day is leaning towards a Dull, Normal or Big Day. Then, assess if it makes sense to theoretically price a spread, be it a Calendar, Iron Condor, Vertical, etc.  This guards you from chasing price near 1 Standard Deviation, to get your orders filled on a Big Day.  Doing this pre-market work, determines if you will be filling orders or scaling off for profit; alternatively, reducing exposure to losses, when the market opens.Want to see a consistently profitable portfolio that prices entries on Dull/Normal Days but takes profit/limits losses on Big Days, at work? Follow the link below, entitled “Consistent Results” to see a retail online option trading portfolio that practices this daily discipline.Statistically there are more Dull and Normal Days to price spreads for entry, especially during mid-July till August, as many floor traders go on leave.  On Dull and Normal Days aggressively pricing the order 0.10-0.15 below Theoretical Price for a debit spread; or, 0.10-0.15 above for a credit spread just means it takes 1-2 hours more to get filled.  If your order is filled within 5 minutes, you were lax in working the entry hard; versus, getting filled in 1-2 hours.  Diligence does make a material difference in the trade’s price-performance.  In avoiding entries on Big Days, you are not missing out on not getting in, when most retail traders are chasing price to get filled.  One key factor of the consistency in your account’s P/L is the price you got in and out of.  The discipline of staying consistent is to get filled within a sustainable range of the spread’s fair value for that particular trading day.  Remaining in the business of online options trading requires as much sense to stay out of trades, as it does to get in to trades. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calloptiontrading.net/stock-option-trading-paradox-more-trades-on-dull-days-and-normal-days-than-big-days/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

